GDay World 376 – KEVLEX, a real-life superhero.

Today’s guest is the founder of the WORLD SUPERHERO REGISTRY, a website deals with the actual incorporation of the superhero archetype into daily life. His superhero name is KEVLEX (a portmanteau of “kevlar” and “spandex”).


(note: this isn’t Kevlex – photo courtesy of Toastie14)

We talked about what it takes to be a superhero in the real world. Fascinating stuff.

You too can be a superhero by becoming a member of the TPN500!
TPN500

Haul 17″ Macbook sleeve

I was looking for a sleeve for my 17″ Macbook Pro – something that isnt as bulky as a whole bag / backpack for when I go to meetings – and the folks at Haul sent me one of theirs. Haul are pretty cool – all of their sleeves and bags are made from recycled billboards! Mine is apparently an old AMEX billboard. They make other things as well from truck inner-tubes, number plates, printing blankets and aluminium cans.

And you can chat with them on Twitter.

If You Aren’t A Celebrity On Twitter, You Don’t Exist

I’m amused and bemused this morning by the reports all of the Aussie news services are running about how much twitter bashing Gretel Killeen copped while hosting the Logies last night. BTW, The Logies, for international readers, is a totally lame annual Australian television industry awards ceremony. Personally, I would rather eat my own underwear than watch it. But apparently some Aussies did and they expressed their disappointment in the show, not by turning it off and reading a frakking book, but by bashing the hostess on Twitter. However the news services running that story this morning (most of whom seem to have just republished the AAP story – hey, who needs journalists when you can use AAP?) seem to be reluctant to mention that names of the people bashing Gretel and just refer to them as “one user said” – unless, of course, the Twitterer was a celebrity, such as Wil Anderson or the Chaser guys. Then they get name checked, but no link to their tweets.

What do you think this means? If you’re an ordinary citizen, it’s alright to quote you but not to mention who you are? Or link to your tweets? Is it because the news services think writing something like

@khushee said: “Gretel mentions Twitter – if only she knew what was being said!”

or

@amileegrant said “Bedtime. I’m over this sad attempt at an awards show. Yawn. Hope gretel gets drunk and falls over and her dress rips off on stage.”

would be too confusing to the non-Twittering public? Or just because they news services don’t think it matters who the non-celebrity Twitterers are?

Celebrity culture – I frakking hate it.

GDay World 375 – Dr Philip Nitschke on Euthanasia

Dr Philip Nitschke, PhD, MBBS, BSc (Hons) is the Founder and Director of Exit International, the world’s leading Voluntary Euthanasia and end-of-life choices information and advocacy organisation.

Philip Nitschke

A few days after recording this interview, Philip and his wife were detained at London’s Heathrow airport for nine hours and denied access to a lawyer. During the interview he mentioned spending more time in the UK – after this week’s experience, he is reconsidering.

TPN500

Idi Amin – friend or foe?

I just finished watching THE LAST KING OF SCOTLAND, a fictional tale set in Uganda during the reign of Idi Amin (1971 – 1979). I know little about Amin – I was born in 1970 – but I remember his name being featured in the TV news during my childhood.

Idi Amin

When Amin died in 2003, in exile in Saudi Arabia (US ally) where he’d been since 1979, apparently never deported for crimes against humanity (it is said somewhere between 80,000 and 500,000 Ugandans died during his years in power), the major news outlets around the world said things like:

Amin, who almost single-handedly turned a nation’s prosperity into economic ruin and plunged a peaceful society into a nightmare of chaos and terror, was admitted to King Faisal Specialist Hospital on July 18. He had been in a coma and on life support since his admission. (The Age, borrowed from the LA Times.)

Amin’s eight years as president of Uganda were characterised by bizarre and murderous behaviour. (The Sydney Morning Herald)

The eight-year rule which followed was characterised by bizarre and brutal behaviour. (The BBC…. eerily almost word-for-word the SMH’s version)

Amin brought bloody tragedy and economic ruin to his country, during a selfish life that had no redeeming qualities. (The Guardian)

THEN… I found this fascinating article, The Making of Idi Amin, which was originally written in 1979 by Pat Hutton and Jonathan Bloch and was re-published on this site in 2001. The re-published version starts:

British government documents, recently declassified under the 30-year rule, have supported earlier accounts by the journalists Pat Hutton and Jonathan Bloch which said the rise of Idi Amin was engineered by outside interests to stop President Milton Obote’s nationalisation drive in which the state had taken 60% interest in all foreign and Ugandan-Asian-owned businesses.

The article goes on to describe the involvement of Britain, the USA and Israel in supporting Amin’s rise to power and his years at the helm. The story is that Amin’s predecessor, President Obote, was planning on nationalising British interests in Uganda – the thing Western imperialists hate the most – and that Amin – a former soldier in the colonial British army – was brought to power by British interests to reverse the nationalisation.

Was Idi Amin another in a long line of brutal dictators brought to power by Western governments who murdered thousands upon thousands of his own people? And the people in the West who brought him to power – like they also did with Saddam and Suharto and Somoza and Batista and Trujillo and Mobutu and Pinochet and Pahlavi – go untouched.

Jon Stewart Backs Down?! Disappointing.

On a recent show, Jon Stewart said that he thought Harry Truman should have been tried as a war criminal for authorizing dropping nuclear bombs on the civilian population of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He backed it up with some justification as to why the acts were just plain wrong. I cheered when I heard it because it’s very rarely that I hear Americans recognize the fact that the bombings were completely unjustified and a war crime of huge proportions. Even my American friends who are pro-justice and anti-war find it extremely hard to say “Yes, the bombings were wrong”. They justify it anyway they can.

Then, on last night’s show, he started by apologizing, saying he was wrong, and completely backing down!

You have to wonder what happened behind the scenes? I totally don’t believe his whole “Oh I knew it was wrong when I said it” shtick. The powers-that-be obviously came down on him HARD. But which powers? The Comedy Central powers? MTV? Viacom? And why? It’s not like Stewart doesn’t say lots of things that the elite don’t like on a nightly basis. Why this one statement?

If anyone can help me understand it, I’d appreciate it. Here’s Stewart talking about the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki:

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart M – Th 11p / 10c
Cliff May Unedited Interview Pt. 3
thedailyshow.com
http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:226123
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Economic Crisis First 100 Days

Here’s the segment where he backs down:

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart M – Th 11p / 10c
Harry Truman Was Not a War Criminal
thedailyshow.com
http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:225918
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Economic Crisis First 100 Days

Jesus Banned By Twitter?

Someone today pointed out to me that the username “Jesus” hadn’t been taken on Twitter – when you go to twitter.com/jesus it’s blank – and suggested I take the username. I was sure someone would have already grabbed, so I went to check out what would happen if I tried to register it. Sure enough, Twitter says the username is already taken:

Although this is obviously not true.

My question is – what if Jesus comes back, tries to reach his followers via Twitter and finds out it’s already taken?! Is this religious discrimination by Twitter?